Handcuffs for Nurses: Immunity for Administrators
Case #6 – When Coverup is the Culture
The Hospital Bureaucracy Defense
Case #6 describes the 75-year-old female patient, Charlene Murphey, in Vanderbilt University Medical Center. The day of her discharge, she went for a routine scan unrelated to her admission. She was given the wrong medication and died.
The healthcare system is designed to protect itself. By making a secret out-of-court settlement with the patient’s family, it silenced them from discussing the case in public. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) concluded its investigation with a 56-page Statement of Deficiencies1 detailing a cascade of systemic failures by the hospital. Administrators claimed, “they didn’t know what they didn’t know.” Despite claiming ignorance, hospital administration was suddenly able to create a 330-page Plan of Correction2 to CMS. They promptly addressed the potential risk of CMS discontinuing its funding, which constitutes 50% of their revenue.
Even with disclosures of negligence, the hospital did not face any fines. It avoided public disciplinary action and negative publicity by blaming the nurse. Accountability for hospital administrators came in the form of compliance, not consequences.
In stark contrast, the nurse who administered the wrong medication, RaDonda Vaughn became the “second victim”3 as she was stripped of her license, fired, and criminally charged. Her decision to be transparent about the error, to cooperate fully with the authorities, became the very grounds for her prosecution. It was a case in which integrity became evidence used against her – hence, the title of the last essay, Make a Mistake – Take the 5th.
When Clinicians Err, They Get Handcuffs
Case #6 in which Nurse Vaughn was the scapegoat for system failures is hardly an isolated case. In every prominent medical error, it is always the healthcare worker who loses and often become “second victims.”4 In Seattle, veteran nurse Kimberly Hiatt miscalculated a medication dose. She self-reported. She was fired and later committed suicide. In Wisconsin, nurse Julie Thao was criminally charged after making a fatal error. After working a third shift after back-to-back 12-hour shifts, a newly installed labeling system confused her. The system that demanded her exhaustion faced no scrutiny over inadequate personnel management claiming “she volunteered.” These individuals might have improved their situation by adopting the strategies used by hospital administrators and insurance executives: defer (claim ignorance), deny (nothing happened), and defend (lawyer up).
Scapegoats in Scrubs: How Health Systems Protect Their Reputations
In high-stakes healthcare environments, errors are inevitable. Yet the aftermath of these errors often reveals not a system committed to safety with transparency, learning and accountability, but one determined to save money and protect its brand at all costs. A consistent and troubling pattern has emerged: when something goes wrong, individual doctors or nurses are isolated, punished, and publicly exposed. The hospital administrators that enable latent errors discussed Do Medical Errors Happen by Design retreat behind legal shields and public relations strategies.
This dynamic operates on several levels:
1. Legal and Financial Risk Management
Hospitals and health systems face immense financial and reputational stakes. When a high-profile medical error occurs, the quickest way to stem liability is to sever ties with the clinician involved. By doing so, institutions signal swift action to regulators, insurers, and the public. Then they claim falsely that HIPAA regulations prevent comment. It's an expedient form of damage control that distances the organization from systemic accountability. This strategy separates the active error from latent systemic errors as revealed in Do Medical Errors Happen by Accident… or by Design?.
2. Narrative Control and Public Image
Hospitals cultivate a narrative of excellence and safety. Acknowledging that a fatal mistake was facilitated by latent errors like flawed workflows, insufficient staffing, poor training, or a toxic culture would directly challenge that image. Comparing the latent errors in Case #5, sepsis following a laceration, to Case #6, a fatal medication error, reveals many similar hidden latent errors. Blaming one clinician for an error shifts the focus from systemic issues to isolated failures of character, obscuring the broader systemic dysfunction. It’s a tactic of institutional storytelling designed to preserve public trust and donor confidence.
3. Opaque Internal Investigations
Sentinel Event Investigations and internal root-cause analyses usually remain confidential, shielded by legal privilege. These investigations may uncover cascading systemic flaws, yet the public rarely sees this complexity that is the topic of these essays. Instead, disciplinary action against a provider is made public while institutional shortcomings are buried in protected documents, shielded from scrutiny. The 330-page jargon-filled response to CMS by Vanderbilt in Case #6 is typical. Even I had trouble reading the double talk.
4. Moral Injury and the Culture of Fear
The result is not just professional ruin for the scapegoated clinician—but a chilling effect across the workforce. When providers see transparency punished and silence rewarded, they learn to hide near-misses instead of reporting them. This erodes the very foundation of a safety culture - transparency. The psychological toll—what’s now recognized as “moral injury”—drives clinicians out of medicine and into burnout, silence, or worse as we discussed in detail in What’s Driving the Exodus of Doctors from Primary Care?
ANECDOTE:
Unlike healthcare workers today, my employees were happy. Many worked for me for decades because they knew I always had their back. I accepted responsibility for their actions. For example, a demanding and rude patient made my receptionist cry. At his next visit I added a large miscellaneous uncovered service to his bill. When he objected to the bill, I came to the checkout myself and spoke to him privately, explaining the situation. I continued that employees are valuable, and I compensated my receptionist with a nice dinner after his last visit because of his demeanor. He was polite afterwards. Furthermore, my staff recognized that they had my support and were transparent with me. Healthcare organizations treat employees as replaceable and will never have their back. It is unsurprising that healthcare workers are unhappy.
5. Unequal Accountability
Institutional leaders rarely face the same consequences and frontline workers. Executives who approve of unsafe staffing ratios to save money, neglect safety investments to increase profits, and ignore staff requests for quality improvements remain insulated. No CEO is stripped of a license or booked into a jail cell. The imbalance is stark: the people with the least control over the broken healthcare systems face the harshest consequences, while those with the power to fix them escape public accountability. Being forced to work in an environment where they see risks to patient safety is discouraging health workers. Knowing hospital administration operates with impunity and will not have their back for any action is disheartening. This injustice also contributes to the toxic work culture, loss of autonomy, and moral injury all of which combine to drive clinicians out of medicine and into burnout, silence, or worse as we discussed in detail in What’s Driving the Exodus of Doctors from Primary Care?
When Health Systems Err, They Edit Documents.
This imbalance strikes at the heart of healthcare’s structural dysfunction. When institutions are treated as too big to fail and individuals too small to protect, a dangerous precedent emerges - silence is rewarded and transparency is punished. What message does that send to the next nurse who makes a near-miss? What happens to a culture when candor becomes criminal?
OPINION
For an industry that consumes 18% of the US GDP, it’s remarkable that health systems and health plans consistently avoid negative media. Monopolies can be large advertisers in a media marketplace. Their delay, defer, defend policies that are very effective in mitigating negative publicity. Hundreds of thousands of people die annually and it is hidden from the public by secret agreements and plausible deniability.
Conclusion
Healthcare doesn't fail because of a single individual’s mistake. It fails when systems incentivize secrecy and absorb blame in spreadsheets instead of confronting it in the open. Evasion of meaningful penalties by health systems when they allow latent errors to occur to save money represents a broader indictment of the regulatory environment. The health system often blames health workers while protecting institutions with bureaucracy.
Until we align responsibility with power—until health systems and insurers bear consequences proportionate to their control over doctors and patients—healthcare will continue to be unsafe. The purpose of a system is what it does.5 Nothing will change until enterprise liability for health systems and insurers replaces individual liability.
Preview
In the next essay we shall see how insurers cause medical errors and how they respond when the light is shined on them.
Patient Action
If a close relative is hospitalized, consider staying with them. Ask for a copy of the doctor’s orders and confirm when each order is carried out. Ask staff how you can help make their workload easier while supporting your loved one.
Physician Action
Does your institution regularly have assemblies of physicians to discuss errors? Does staff at your institution have any mechanism for physicians as a group to advocate for patient safety improvements?
https://irp.cdn-website.com/812f414d/files/uploaded/VANDERBILT-CMS-PDF.pdf
https://hospitalwatchdogrevised-10bc5a9.ingress-earth.ewp.live/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/VUMC-PLAN-OF-CORRECTION.pdf
Idem
Stafford Beer quote